ISO-Readyness ++

Driven by ISO 27001:2024, ISO 9001 and ISO 42001 standards, we build robust, scalable and zero-maintenance infrastructure, processes and organizations.

The problem we solve

Do not aim only for ISO certification; we transform your org and IT sytems operationally effective, robust and resilient.

Our Value Proposition

ISO certification only shows that you meet minimum requirements. While ISO standards and guidelines provide the framework for our transformational leadership work, we set out to build operational resilience, high fault tolerance, complete automation and zero maintenance systems, and the design of processes.

What you get

Concrete Examples

* We anonymized the names of our clients in consideration of the presented problems and situations.

Information security for use of cloud services

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · Annex A
Requirement
“Acquiring, using, managing and exiting cloud services follows a defined process that sets the security requirements.”
Status at AuditGap

IT team members at one of our proptech clients signed up for various cloud services with company credentials, without formal internal approval. As a result, 11 different SaaS systems handled customer data. 8 of them had neither a data processing agreement nor an exit plan, and nobody at the client knew exactly how data was processed and stored, or had validated those procedures.

What was the minimum required to pass?

Keep a register of cloud services, with a data processing agreement for every tool, a designated owner and a documented exit plan, reviewed yearly. That is enough to comply.

How our solution was superior?

In ClickUp, which the client already used, we built a self-service procurement flow in which every request automatically received a risk assessment, an onboarding checklist and contract templates. Only the CTO could approve a request. We mentored the team members and introduced a new rule in the information security policy, alongside an SOP: new infrastructure may only be introduced as IaC. We reduced the 11 SaaS tools to 6 and imported them into IaC. As a result, continuous control became automated, governed, documented and auditable.

Responsibilities after termination or change of employment

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · Annex A
Requirement
“Security responsibilities and duties that remain valid after termination or change of employment are defined, communicated and enforced.”
Status at AuditPartially holds

At a fintech client there was a detailed offboarding checklist that included revoking access rights, but no detailed, documented SOP existed for it in the IT department. Of the 9 leavers in samples from recent years, 7 former employees still had system access (email, CRM, cloud), several of them at critical levels.

What was the minimum required to pass?

The offboarding checklist must include a confidentiality reminder, signed return of equipment and a deadline for revoking access (for example 24 hours).

How our solution was superior?

We used MS365 Entra ID as the centralized SCIM system and configured it as an external IdP in AWS, so access to laptops, MS365 licences, test and production systems and email could be controlled from one place. We documented the offboarding protocol and trained the IT leads. As a result, the permissions of 48 colleagues could be reduced, the number of admin-level accounts fell from 8 to 2, and for a new leaver access could be revoked within 5 minutes.

Change management

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · Annex A
Requirement
“Changes to information processing facilities and systems follow change management procedures.”
Status at AuditPartially holds

At a fintech client, the code reviews of the 12-person IT team were done by two lead developers, often with minimal feedback and manual modifications. Infrastructure changes were made in the AWS console, and reported by email to the external AWS partner.

What was the minimum required to pass?

A ticket must be opened for every infrastructure change, with approval and a rollback plan recorded and production changes logged. If the team can show similar evidence for the last two or three changes, that is enough for certification...

How our solution was superior?

We wrote IaC for the entire AWS infrastructure with Terraform, which GitHub Actions CI/CD deployed automatically to both test and production after code-review approval. Terraform detected drift automatically, which we also used actively for the migration, and faulty deployments could be reverted with a rollback commit, automatically and without human intervention. The process became fully automated, documented, controlled and audited. Deployments that used to happen every 2 months on average became daily.

Data resources

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · AI management system, Annex A
Requirement
“The organization documents the data resources used by its AI systems.”
Status at AuditSatisfied

Our client had a register of the training, test and validation datasets, the data was anonymized, and the data owners (sources) were named. The data had been created roughly 10 months before our assessment, entirely by hand.

What was the minimum required to pass?

A register of the data sources used by AI, with owner, classification and legal basis, updated yearly. The organization's current state meets the ISO requirements...

How our solution was superior?

We assessed and documented how the data is produced and automated it with scripts, so datasets were produced daily. For training (and validating) the AI model we built a batch pipeline that runs weekly and, when the validation results are successful, deploys the resulting model. After several weeks of iterative training the model showed a significant F-score improvement (quality improved considerably), and the new process delivered controlled, verified robustness.

Quality of data for AI systems

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · AI management system, Annex A
Requirement
“The organization defines and documents data quality requirements and makes sure the data meets them.”
Status at AuditPartially holds

At our client, quality requirements for the training data had not been defined. Analysis of the training dataset revealed several critical problems (11% duplicate or incomplete records, non-anonymized PII, duplicate-value issues). The data was labeled manually by two interns, without training or instructions.

What was the minimum required to pass?

Describe the data quality requirements, clean the training data once and document the checks. Evidence of this is adequate for certification...

How our solution was superior?

Based on the use case, the application area and the model, we defined and documented the data quality (and quantity) requirements up front. From the existing sources we exported the most extensive dataset, then normalized, cleaned, deduplicated and anonymized it, and coded this process so it is repeatable. The pipeline ran validation tests on the resulting data (freshness, duplicates, missing values, label checks, and quantity thresholds per vertical). After its very first successful run, the pipeline produced training data that increased the model's accuracy and coverage by 14% and 32%. After that, the pipeline and the training were re-run automatically every month.

Next step

Want more than just the minimum?

Book a call

Our other services

01AI-Ready IT03Tech Due Diligence04Interim leadership & consulting